top of page

When You MUST Commit to MRP instead of an MVP

  • Admin NorrisDesign
  • Mar 10
  • 2 min read

Updated: Aug 27

📉 Your retail supply chain is outdated.


A global fashion retailer knew its warehouse management system (WMS) was breaking down—leading to:

❌ Stockouts on high-demand items.

❌ Slow order fulfillment.

❌ Rising customer dissatisfaction.


The team debated: Should we launch an MVP first or go straight to MRP?


Case Study: Replacing a Legacy Warehouse Management System


🔹 The Challenge:

  • Their 20-year-old WMS couldn’t support real-time inventory tracking.

  • Poor e-commerce fulfillment meant lost sales and increased returns.

  • An MVP test for AI-driven demand forecasting helped, but it didn’t fix the core problem: the WMS itself.


🔹 Why They Chose MRP Instead of MVP:

  • Incremental fixes wouldn’t solve systemic failures.

  • Increment improvements weren’t tying fragmented systems together.

  • The executive team invested in a full WMS replacement with an AI-powered inventory system.

  • Instead of testing a feature add-on, they built for long-term scalability.


🔹 Results:

  • ✅ 30% faster fulfillment across 100+ locations.

  • ✅ 20% fewer stockouts, increasing sales revenue.

  • ✅ Millions saved from reduced returns & optimized inventory.


Key Takeaways 


🚀 The lesson? If your underlying system is the problem, MVP testing won’t fix it.


🔹 Actionable Steps:

  1. Diagnose system-wide issues vs. isolated inefficiencies – Are you dealing with a process gap or a legacy system failure?

  2. Avoid MVPs as a band-aid – Some problems require a full replacement.

  3. Calculate long-term ROI – Delaying an MRP can cost millions in operational inefficiencies.


“Retail supply chains need flexibility. If your WMS is 10+ years old, what’s your roadmap for replacement?”

📌 How Full Sail Helps You Make the Right Decision


At Full Sail, we help retail organizations assess whether an MVP or an MRP is the best path forward.


💡 Our process ensures:

✅ Strategic assessment of whether a small-scale MVP can validate impact before major investment.

✅ Risk reduction strategies to avoid overcommitting to large-scale replacements prematurely.

✅ A clear roadmap for scaling successful MVPs into hospital-wide deployments.


📈 The Bottom Line:


An MVP approach delivers quick wins and ensures scalability—but only when deployed strategically. Before making multi-million-dollar commitments, are you testing solutions effectively?


🚀 How Full Sail Helps Companies Navigate This Investment


At Full Sail, we provide: ✅ Independent contract reviews before you commit to a vendor.✅ Cost & risk assessments to identify potential hidden expenses.✅ Implementation roadmaps that align software, automation, and operational readiness.


 
 
 

Comments


About the Author

Daniel LeSieur is the founder and CEO of Full Sail Product Management Consulting, based in Northwest Arkansas. He helps companies streamline product strategy, optimize inventory, and improve supply chain efficiency. With over two decades of business leadership and consulting experience, Daniel partners with clients to turn ideas into market-ready solutions.

Fuel 6.4_edited.jpg
bottom of page